In Defence of Social Networks – well, someone has to do it…
no responses

Vince Cable has launched into the Social Networks with tooth and claw and in Vincent’s case, the teeth may be a little rotten and the claws somewhat calcified, but the dear man does have a record of speaking the truth quite often. So he needs to be taken seriously, even though he heads a party which is tottering toward oblivion.

To sum up, he’s miffed as are so many of his – and my generation. His response to the recent Cambridge Analytica revelations is a cry for the networks to be broken up, submitted to regulation (preferably by the EU. But he would say that wouldn’t he as a fervent opponent of Brexit and therefore further proof of the idiocy of our leaving the comfort of powerful regulators.) He says Facebook et al are a threat to Democracy itself! They are corporate monopolies which have transformed from heroes to villains. And so, he says, we need official watchdogs to guard us from these villains, to regulate them and to ensure consumers are paid when their data is used.

The Vince is usually right about many things and he is partly right about the social networks. I find it rather uncomfortable when people attack Fb and co for their failings (there are many) and forget the incredibly useful things they do. Fb in particular has assumed the role of granny’s best friend – it is used by so many grandparents to keep contact with children and grandchildren all over the world. Nowadays very few youngsters would be seen dead on that particular platform, preferring Instagram and Snapchat. I have found it immensely useful – it has allowed me to contact many lost old friends; it is very useful for me for marketing my books, website and blog and above all it cheers me up with cat videos.

Only the immensely dumb put secret and personal information on the internet. I tell all my pupils, never put ANYTHING on the Internet you wouldn’t want your granny to see. Facebook is a public forum, you are out there in the open air so why the hell drop your trousers? Facebook is, one must remember, free. And it seems rather mean not to allow them to monetise the information they have on their users, just make damn sure they only know what you want them to know. And if they can work out what makes you tick and they allow people to advertise things to you which you may find of interest, well, ignoring ads is something we do all the damn time. I have no objection to being paid for the use of my data, but would feel rather guilty! Unless, of course, I was paying Facebook for their service to me.
Twitter on the other hand is a space for bots, politicos, fake news, gossip and of course trolling. A very scary place but I have learned how to navigate it safely. The rules are: if trolled immediately block the troll, don’t argue. Learn to recognise a bot – they have inhuman characteristics and after one or two tweets they are easy to spot. With intelligent people who have different views to my own, I really enjoy a darn good discussion. I have, in the past, persuaded a very few to my point-of view; but even when I haven’t. often the conversation drifts into a place of mutual respect, tolerance and even friendship. One of my best Twitter mates is a Texan conservative Republican. We discuss, rather than argue.
Oh, and I don’t use Instagram or Snapchat. I can’t be arsed.
So good on yer Vincent, but frankly it’s a massive overreaction from a generation which assumes most people are too stupid to use these networks carefully and responsibly. And as I said, that’s partly right.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Designed and developed to comply with current web standards by Design UnLtd If you are experiencing problems with accessing the site, please send us a message .
    Top